Pages: [1]
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: abrahamic god the worst serial killer  (Read 946 times)
PAPY2000
Newbie
*
Posts: 21


View Profile Email
« on: June 14, 2009, 11:07:49 PM »
fuzoid: Your observations regarding "fleeing to Egypt" and the "slaughter of the innocents" is absolutely correct. The Gospels are full of contradictions and inconsistencies.

Here is quick one. Matthew 26:15 says they "weighed out 30 pieces of silver" to pay Judas. The problem is, using pieces of silver as currency had gone out of practice 300 years before. Well documented Roman history tells us that in the time of Jesus minted coins were used. There is more to this story, but you get the point.

For one to accept the Bible as the unerring word of God one has to make a huge leap of faith. Too huge for me, and by all indications, too huge for you. You have used your powers of reason, your intellect. This is a good thing. A very good thing
Logged
mani123
Newbie
*
Posts: 17


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2009, 12:51:59 AM »
Both Matthew and Luke give geneologies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17, Luke 3:23-38). Both show that he was a direct descendant of King David. Nowhere does the bible mention Mary's or any other female geneology. Paul says in Romans 1:3 that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" which was necessary and required for the Messiah. If Joseph's lineage goes back to King David and that lineage is required for Jesus to be the Messiah, then Joseph would have to be the father of Jesus. Not the stepfather or the adoptive father, the actual father. This is the requirement of Messianic law.

But then we are told that Jesus was born of a virgin chosen by God. No mention of King David or lineage back to him by Mary or any other woman.

I think we have a problem.
Logged
chrystal520
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 51



View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2009, 12:22:51 AM »
Quote from: mani123 on June 15, 2009, 12:51:59 AM
Both Matthew and Luke give geneologies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17, Luke 3:23-38). Both show that he was a direct descendant of King David. Nowhere does the bible mention Mary's or any other female geneology. Paul says in Romans 1:3 that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" which was necessary and required for the Messiah. If Joseph's lineage goes back to King David and that lineage is required for Jesus to be the Messiah, then Joseph would have to be the father of Jesus. Not the stepfather or the adoptive father, the actual father. This is the requirement of Messianic law.

But then we are told that Jesus was born of a virgin chosen by God. No mention of King David or lineage back to him by Mary or any other woman.

I think we have a problem.
read the teachings of barnabus. it was stricken from the bible by the catholic domain because it threatened the church.
Logged
much love and respect
  chrystal
vanessa
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 52


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2009, 03:08:32 AM »
Quote from: chrystal520 on June 16, 2009, 12:22:51 AM
Quote from: mani123 on June 15, 2009, 12:51:59 AM
Both Matthew and Luke give geneologies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17, Luke 3:23-38). Both show that he was a direct descendant of King David. Nowhere does the bible mention Mary's or any other female geneology. Paul says in Romans 1:3 that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" which was necessary and required for the Messiah. If Joseph's lineage goes back to King David and that lineage is required for Jesus to be the Messiah, then Joseph would have to be the father of Jesus. Not the stepfather or the adoptive father, the actual father. This is the requirement of Messianic law.

But then we are told that Jesus was born of a virgin chosen by God. No mention of King David or lineage back to him by Mary or any other woman.

I think we have a problem.
read the teachings of barnabus. it was stricken from the bible by the catholic domain because it threatened the church.

well i had heard that too..do you have any information on where i can read this barnabus teaching?
Logged
SawDusT{RM}
Newbie
*
Posts: 48



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2009, 08:55:22 AM »
But then we are told that Jesus was born of a virgin chosen by God

Yep a Virgin who already had several other kids

Hey That Makes My Mom A Virgin To  LMAOAY
Logged
rajiv123
Full Member
***
Posts: 188


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2010, 11:37:28 AM »
Both Matthew and Luke give geneologies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17, Luke 3:23-38). Both show that he was a direct descendant of King David. Nowhere does the bible mention Mary's or any other female geneology. Paul says in Romans 1:3 that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" which was necessary and required for the Messiah. If Joseph's lineage goes back to King David and that lineage is required for Jesus to be the Messiah, then Joseph would have to be the father of Jesus. Not the stepfather or the adoptive father, the actual father. This is the requirement of Messianic law.

But then we are told that Jesus was born of a virgin chosen by God. No mention of King David or lineage back to him by Mary or any other woman.

I think we have a problem.


SMARTLIPO HOUSTON
sales recruitment network
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to: